District 99 School Board Approves $70.3 Million Tax Levy
The approved extension is 4.9 percent higher than last year's request, which is necessary to cover new construction values, diminishing state aid and a potential shift in pension costs, officials said.
Community High School District 99 has set its proposed 2012-13 tax levy at $70.3 million, not including the bond and interest fund—a 4.9 percent hike over last year’s levy.
The District 99 school board voted 6-1 during their Nov. 18 board meeting to approve the levy. Board Member Keith Matune cast the lone dissenting vote.
Because this year's increase did not exceed the 2011 extension by more than 5 percent, the district was not required to hold a public hearing or publish levy information, according District 99 Controller Mark Staehlin.
Despite the 4.9-percent increase requested by District 99, the amount of additional property tax revenue a district can receive from existing property is capped at 3 percent, the value set by the Consumer Price Index. Every year, most districts levy higher than the cap in order to capture revenue from new construction.
Preliminary estimates for District 99's property assessments indicate that the 2012 equalized assessed value could drop as much as 8 percent compared to 2011, Staehlin said.
Regardless of the change, the assessed values no longer have a bearing on the district's revenue growth due to the tax cap, he added.
From 2000 to 2007, the district saw assessed values grow at a rate of 8 percent a year. However, the tax extensions were limited to the cost of living factor, which was about 2.7 percent for those same seven years, Staehlin said.
During that time, the district's tax rate dropped from $1.67 to $1.30. Staehlin said the housing market is now "making a correction," meaning the rate is increasing to reflect what it should have been for that period of time.
Staehlin predicts the rate will increase by about 17 cents for this year's levy in order to provide for a 3-percent increase in the district's extension on existing properties. The net increase on District 99's portion of the property tax bill will result in a $44.32 per year increase on a $300,000 market value home, he said.
In explaining his vote, Matune said he is opposed to raising taxes. "The system is broken," he said, referring to the issues with the state and CPI.
The district's new construction values are expected to be similar to those of last year, when they were the lowest of the past 15 years. Using preliminary estimates from the township assessors, the district expects new values to be about 0.4 percent.
Officials added a new construction factor of .8 percent to the levy request to protect the district.
According to Staehlin, about 80 percent of District 99's revenue comes from property tax.
"It's a double-edged thing, in that it's tough on taxpayers but also provides a fantastic stability to our school system that many schools in Illinois dont enjoy," Staehlin said. "We are able to maintain stability because of our tax levy."
The district's property tax revenue has become increasingly important in recent years as state funding has become less reliable, Staehlin said. Rather than lowering the foundation level for funding, the state will pro-rate between 80 and 84 percent.
Regular education transportation will be pro-rated at 50 percent, Staehlin said.
Additionally, the district is also preparing for the possibility of a shift in pension costs—a scenario that has been debated all year as the Illinois General Assembly looks for ways to address its $83 billion unfunded pension liability, $44 billion of which is from the Teachers’ Retirement System (TRS).
State legislators are proposing that the portion that would typically be paid by the state become the responsibility of local school districts and in turn, that of local taxpayers.
The move would save the state a reported $1.3 billion per year—but mean millions of dollars in costs for already cash-strapped districts, according to reports.
Staehlin said the district would take a $400,000 hit if the shift was implemented next year.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
There are plenty of ways to keep up on Downers Grove news:
Karen M. Bushy
11:49 am on Friday, November 30, 2012
Wonder if the school board members remember or realize that those taxes are also passed on to the little businesses that lease space in the various shopping centers in town. The double hit of more taxes plus the devastation of the 75th Street construction project will push many of us over the edge. It is not just the residential that has to pay more - you are killing your little businesses. Thanks, Downers Grove.
Lee
2:06 pm on Friday, November 30, 2012
Just wondering... Didn't "conservative Republican" Debbie Boyle vote for this tax increase?
Carol Kania Morency
12:42 pm on Friday, November 30, 2012
Thanks for the detailed story. Levies are hard to understand and hard to write about. But I am wondering why Keith Matune voted against the levy?
Scott C.
1:32 pm on Friday, November 30, 2012
An increase of 5% would have required a public hearing. So it would appear that they snuck in a 4.9% increase to avoid the hearing. As one DG official noted, if that is the case, it is poor government.
Perhaps Keith Matune realized the school board was being too cute in that regard and voted no because he has a conscience.
Most of us understand the need for increased funding in education. Some of us are happy to go along with increases. But sneaky maneuvering only draws more skepticism and attention...at least it should.
I wonder if any of the Board members would like to explain how they arrived at the remarkably convenient 4.9%?
Lee
1:49 pm on Friday, November 30, 2012
"Because this year's increase did not exceed the 2011 extension by more than 5 percent, the district was not required to hold a public hearing or publish levy information, according District 99 Controller Mark Staehlin."
Kudos to Keith Matune...
Sad.
Amanda Luevano
3:15 pm on Friday, November 30, 2012
Sorry for not including the details about Keith Matune's vote. Essentially he was opposed to raising taxes. "The system is broken," he said, referring to the issues with the state and CPI. He said $44 might not seem like a big deal, but it is if the other taxing bodies also raise taxes. It becomes a big burden on taxpayers, he said.
DHD
3:17 pm on Friday, November 30, 2012
Everyone it's capped at 3% for existing properties. 4.9% would apply to new construction.
Amanda Luevano
4:20 pm on Friday, November 30, 2012
DHD, you are correct. Districts always levy outside the cap to capture new construction.
Dan F.
9:40 am on Monday, December 3, 2012
Unacceptable. What a scam. Keith M. is dead bang right on this one.
Sam D
12:17 pm on Monday, December 3, 2012
The system is broken per Keith Matune. So what do our illustrious board members do???? Throw more money at it? Sounds like the new America!! Fantastic. What a joke these people are. Lee, I don't know why you single out only one member for her vote. Is it because she is conservative and this wouldn't be a conservative way of thinking? I am at a loss. Maybe you have issues with Ms. Boyle. Either way, this is a disgrace to the taxpayers. There should have to be a meeting regardless of the percentage. This way the board would have to answer to us and look us in the eye when they respond.
PAUL C.
9:46 pm on Monday, December 3, 2012
http://www.dupage.k12.il.us/pdf/Annual_Report/Annual_Report_2012.pdf
This report has some enlightening information. While I am not happy about tax increases for District 99, I am also very happy with the quality of education my son is receiving at Downers Grove North. Quality of education keeps our area a desireable place to live and is a major reason that people seek to make Downers Grove their home. The teacher pension issue is what it is and will take time to repair and bring back to reality. There aren't too many Cook County high schools that I would rank with DGN. We all want better technology in our schools, better atheletic fields that are safer and qualified teachers that interact well with our students and parents. Yes housing values have decreased for the most part in DG but not as bad as other areas of Dupage! Recently 4 students received perfect ACT scores at DGS and several (8...I think) students at DGN were named as semi-finalist to the National Merit Society. These are positive results. Could it be better? Yes but the reality is the reality right now and one must ask is $45 per $300k housing value that much for our community to have schools as good as DGN and DGS. Even if I didn't have a son at DGN and one a year away, I'd a still have to agree good schools are good for DGN as a whole.
Marty
5:58 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013
Just from an insiders point of view, DGN has lowered their standards from 4 years ago. DGN is making it easier for their students to get better grades. Students have certain opportunities to take tests over until they reach a "C". Mr Kasik has a goal to make minority students (who do not pay taxes in the District) feel more welcomed and get more understanding). These were his words to the staff in a memo. So I suggest you look at how this District has lowered its standards for the students to get a better report for themselves. AP courses, accountability and work ethics are not encouraged. Instead, they are focused on feelings not academics.I'm happy my children are graduated and attended when academics meant something.