What Did You Think of the Drew Peterson Lifetime Movie?
Lifetime debuted "Drew Peterson: Untouchable" last night. What did you think?
Now's not the time to awkwardly deny you watch Lifetime movies, not when the channel's most recent flick was about Bolingbrook's own, Drew Peterson.
Lifetime debuted "Drew Peterson: Untouchable" last night. The film stars Rob Lowe as Peterson, the disgraced ex-Bolingbrook cop who is accused of killing his third wife, Kathleen Savio, in March 2004.
The movie has been in the works for nearly a year and is based off of Shorewood Patch Editor Joseph Hosey's book Fatal Vows: The Tragic Wives of Drew Peterson.
Patch movie critic Dave Wilson said the movie "remains true to the real-life saga, which is a relief."
He goes on:
After all, you can’t get much weirder than what we can only imagine really happened to Drew’s third and fourth wives.
Rob Lowe really did his homework on the South Suburban accent here. Lowe nails the flat nasally voice that we’re all familiar with. I can easily imagine him perfectly ordering up a poor boy at Merichka’s.
One minor complaint about the overall film: Where was Will County State’s Attorney Jim Glasgow? With his neatly trimmed ‘stache and muscle Ts, he would have been an easy cast fit here.
Chicago Sun-Times movie critic Richard Roeper said he was hoping the movie "would do justice to the memories of Kathleen Savio and Stacy Peterson, and achieve something beyond high camp."
The Chicago Tribune also reviewed the movie: "You come to this prepared to laugh, because of (Rob) Lowe, because of Lifetime, because of what our public reaction to Peterson came to be," says the review, which was written by Steve Johnson. "But despite a lurid trailer that made the rounds, this is no piece of inadvertent high camp."
Meanwhile, Hosey said:
"The screenwriter, Teena Booth, did a great job of cramming five years of complicated storyline into less than two hours. I also got a kick out of watching Rob Lowe re-enact things I had seen in Drew's neighborhood and home, and how the actors portrayed people I got to know pretty well over the years."
What did you think of Lifetime's "Drew Peterson: Untouchable"? Leave a comment and interact with other Patch readers by leaving a comment below!
John Law
6:29 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
What a comical piece of bloated, campy, fictitious garbage that was. From the very first moment of the 2 man unit (a Sgt. Driving in a 2 man car than never existed at BPD) showing up to the disturbance call. The unintentional comical lines. The full party at the PD, then Drew locking #3 in a cell, you just knew this would be pathetic use of 120 minutes. And boy I wasn't let down. Anyone that thinks this resembles anything close to real life or a factual account, well you better check yourself for a lobotomy scar.
Robert
8:35 pm on Monday, January 23, 2012
I am glad that the movie intrigued so many to watch. It demonstrated what a stalker/abuser looks like before during and after relationships. Drew Peterson is not unique, all too many men turn into mini Drews when their intimate partner decides to end the relationship. The awareness is mainly for women, remember: develop a paper trail documenting evidence of stalking. Caller ID records, logs of phone calls, copies of threatening letters, pictures of injuries, or of the stalker sitting outside the home, are examples of evidence that may help build a case.
Inform law enforcement officials about the stalking and provide them with this evidence to support a case. If law enforcement officials refuse to conduct an investigation, consider contacting the prosecuting attorney’s office, or a local victim assistance agency. A victim may be eligible to obtain a restraining or protective order.
april
5:05 am on Friday, January 27, 2012
I have to agree with ya on everything you said. They play stacy off as being nieve to the whole world around her and drew being sweet has honey. What I want to know is how much did Joe make off of these murder and how much actually went to the families of Kathleen and
Stacy?
Dan Budenz
5:06 pm on Friday, January 27, 2012
We are working on the major motion picture "Drew" based on the first non quick release third book about the Peterson case, "Analyzing Monsters - The Drew Peterson Saga". We intend to present the truth, proper sequence, proper names and real ending. Many of the Lifetime non events presented as evidence were debunked long ago. The blue tote or barrel story is actually a drunkalog of Peterson's newer stepbrother Tom Morphey as told to his neighbor Walter Martinek. There is no police report on the garage confrontation with the now famous line, "I'm untouchable bitch". It never happened. Peterson's two adult sons who were living in the home at the time of Kathleen's death both refute the Hosey quick release Book (Ends before Dr. Phil's Lie Detector Show- Peterson passed). Stephen was a cop at the time. They doubt any murders occurred let alone that their father did it. Stacy also provided a solid alibi. Is she an accessory to murder? If real evidence has anything to do with real justice and Karma does exist one may see Drew Peterson playing Rob Lowe on the big screen soon. Peterson was senior staff sergeant manning the desk on nights. Do you think he was cruising with a no humor partner during the day or ever for that matter? Based on evidence the prosecution should be looking at other potential suspects in addition to Peterson if they still believe their murder theory. The main thing the lifetime movie nailed is that Drew (and now Rob Lowe as Drew) can kill a good time.
kat
6:50 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
John Law's posted comment makes me think he must be related to Drew or is a cop that knows/knew Drew....intelligent people know that why details may vary, the dynamics of violent relationships remain the same....I certainly do not need a movie to realize that this man is an abuser in the most dangerous way; too bad the cowardly brother won't tell what he and his brother did with the blue container. what a bunch of loser cowards. but time has taught me that their horrible deeds will catch up to them eventually.
Gary
10:23 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
I'm guessing it is Drew or his attorney.
Gary
11:12 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
Kat, the step-brother helped load a "blue container" into Drew's vehicle (which had been seen on Drew's property before, but no longer there). He was then told to hold a cellphone while Drew took off for a while, BUT DO NOT ANSWER IT. Amazingly, Stacy's cellphone later called this phone while Drew was gone (probably to show a signal from her phone where the body might or might not be?). Later on the brother realized what he might have helped to do and tried to commit suicide. This is why he was hospitalized. The search at this time all over the area was to find Stacy's body, or the alleged "blue container", which has never been found.
Robert
7:24 am on Monday, January 23, 2012
You are right kat, Gary and all others. The box of rocks that those men are they blog during all this under different names. too comical. go back and review those under John Law especially. Any "lawyer" or court IS and keeping tabs on it...Glad they aren't representing me.
D.A.
4:54 pm on Monday, January 23, 2012
This movie portrayed his "Brother" is such a poor manner. GLENN is a kind, caring, loving, straight forward person. He is not a drugged out idiot the movie made him out to be. So sad!!! He did not try to commit suicide, that was bullcrap!
SLAG
7:08 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
I couldn't wait until the movie was over; I kept looking at my clock to see how much longer it was until the end. I am curious to know how much of the movie was based on fact, i.e., the party in the PD, Drew finding Stacy having lunch w/a male friend at an OUTSIDE cafe, how much the children actually witnessed, etc.
Christy Broades
7:55 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
Well, instead of looking at your clock you could have picked up the remote and changed the channel if you hated it that much....that's the small rectangular thing that controls the tv. Noone forced you to watch it, so don't complain about it. If it was that bad, you didnt "have to wait" for it to be over... you should have turned it off..
Rachel Rogers
8:30 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
Sharon, I definitely agree with Christy - why didn't you just change the channel??? Drew DID catch stacy having lunch with a male friend - the movie touched on certain aspects of what happened - You either don't know much of the story, or you are on Peterson's side.
Emerson
9:10 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
I was curious about which restaurant it was Stacy met her male friend. After a Google search, it turns out that it was Denny's. Looked pretty good in the movie! I haven't been there in years, they must have remodeled?
my opinion
11:15 am on Monday, January 23, 2012
it was like a car wreck....just couldn't turn away, had to look.
Michael Waugh
4:44 pm on Monday, January 23, 2012
To answer your questions you need to do research. Read Joseph Hosey's book. Drew did approach Stacy and her male friend at the Denny's in Bolingbrook. I know this because I deliver mail in that town.
Dan Budenz
5:24 pm on Friday, January 27, 2012
Peterson did confirm the restaurant incident. Peterson also suspected the reverend (younger than the movie portrayal at the time) of sexual interests. The Reverend is reported to have met with Stacy off church grounds and also dined with her. Peterson shared Stacy would ride her Harley past his home/office in her bikini just to tease him and provide a laughable moment for the both of them. Three children are now adults. they should be listened to. Stacy, Kathleen, Drew and the older boys have parented the younger children very well.
Eileen
8:02 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
It was down right creepy. Who cares how the actors were, they were telling a disturbing story. Rob Lowe was funny as Peterson, but tried a bit too hard on the Chicago accent. It saddens me to see what actually could have happened. I am sure the creep is guilty with a capital "G"!!!
Dale
8:10 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
Rob Lowe did an amazing job especially since he had to keep his eyes squinted the whole time. It definately gave us an insight as to how "full of himself" he really is. But, I do agree that it would have been more informative if we had known if the children knew more, however, they may have not said anything as of yet either. They are still really young and it is their father. Love that the neighbor got so involved. I think we all should be aware of whats going on around us to help, if God forbid we are ever put in this situation.
christina
8:13 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
I agree wiith john. I grew up in bolingbrook and the portrayal was aweful. .i wasn't impressed at all but it does have a string altough tiny of truth. The main point was to reiterate what the public already knows about the case. It did however make bpd look like fools which they most definatly are not. The cops aren't fools they just cldnt believe one of their own could be so evil...
Tina
8:51 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
I think it was pretty good! It would have been nice if they stayed more true to Joe's book. A lot of what he wrote was more interesting than some of things embellished in the movie. I did wonder why Petersons scumbag lawyer wasn't in the storyline? BUT overall It was very entertaining, the Book was just better!
Therese
9:38 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
I learned absolutely nothing new that hasn't already been reported in the news. I do think Rob Lowe did an amazing job of transforming himself in the "Drew Peterson" who we all saw with our own eyes on the media circus stunts he did. Fact is, no matter how the movie is spun (and it is based on true life - not true life) Drew Peterson will be judged - by a jury of his peers but even more importantly, on his very own Judgement day.
Tom Selleck
9:48 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
Two words! It sucked!
Tom Selleck
9:50 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
Palm trees and California style homes,and what's with Drew getting out of the passenger side of a Police squad! Bolingbrook doesn't and never had two man marked squad cars! What a fairy tale of a movie!
Tom Selleck
9:52 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
Plus the movie shows Drew working on the engine of a plane that looks like a Cessna ! I believe the only plane he ever owned was a ultra light! Plus the interior scenes of the houses are definitely not Bolingbrook style homes whats so ever!
Larry L
10:01 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
The acting was fair. Every thing in it stuck somewhat to what has alresdy been reported.I just hope it does not taint his trial.My last comment. I still think the same as before I saw the Movie. Make the robe strong and the tree tall. He is a digrace to Police Officers and Human beings.
Tom Selleck
10:08 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
I was just thinking! The way judges have been handing down sentences for murders as of late! 15,20 and 30 years for very violent murders that were on the news, Drew should maybe make a deal and have his lawyers ask for 20 years!
Colleen Petrik
10:11 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
Well, thus so far, I have read all your comments so far on this page and I believe that almost all of you just didn't get the movie that was made for lifetime. The movie was not suppose to get into that much detail, it was showing what an arragant manipulative dirty man he was towards young woman. It also wanted to give the neighbors insight as much as possible. We need to look at the real storyline here, maybe things were a little off quilter, but let's not forget the truth. We all know in our hearts that Peterson is guilty, and he will have to face judgement day. And let's keep praying that one day that Stacey's body is recovered for closure for all her family and friends and especially her children!
Will Sperling
10:12 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
I think Hollywood made it a little too glamorous. I'm kind of surprised that the Village of Bolingbrook allowed the production company to use "Bolingbrook Police" emblazoned squad cars. Even if they were movie props, they looked almost identical to the current scheme. I also think it ended abruptly, with Drew's arrest, and then a few comments before the closing credits. The kids had to have seen a lot more than the movie depicted, too.
Gary
10:14 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
I thought the movie and acting were okay at best, but the movie did show the true side of Peterson: an arrogant abuser that likes to chase little girls around in the hopes that he can have his complete control over them. Once they see the light, and no longer give in to him, they just seem to "disappear" so that he can move on to another. I've never seen any type of remorse on his part. If he was a former "detective", why wouldn't he help in finding Stacy? In my eyes, he's as guilty as sin! If he doesn't rot in jail, he'll eventually burn in hell.
Tom Selleck
10:22 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
Gary I agree! But can he be found guilty fairly beyond a reasonable doubt! Who's autopsy can any say is right or wrong! Each examiner is going to have their own opinion and perspective on cause of death! The story line of the movie is a majority of hearsay and facts can be misinterpreted or what did actually occur ! Anyone can say he did this and that, but how will anyone ever know how true it can be!
Gary
10:23 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
I read these posts on here and wonder which one is actually written by Peterson under a phony name? Judge for yourself!
Robert H
7:31 am on Monday, January 23, 2012
Gary, this is the obvious. also John Law, and a few other "female" names.
Too funny that I was thinking the same, what a freak of nature.
Watchful Eye
10:27 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
I think the movie people accomplished what they wanted to. They took a nationally known buffoon, who is currently sitting in jail awaiting trial for the murder of his third wife, and showcased the nonsense he and his lawyer conjured up for their own good, no one else's. The two of them used each other for their fame whore moments, and I hope it all backfires.
Read the book. It's the real story. Joe wrote about the events as they unfolded. He could not and did not make the twin clowns say and do what they did, which helped turn the movie into what it was. I am appalled that so many naysayers waste their time dissing everyone around the murder defendant, rather than hold his feet to the fire for the circumstances surrounding the death of the mothers of four of his children. In that case, if he does ever get out, may he move next door to YOU. Just get your young daughters out of dodge first.
Gordon Woltman
10:35 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
I have no comment....I didn't watch it
Tom Selleck
10:52 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
Gary if you haven't heard, Drew does not have access to the Internet or a computer !!!
Gary
10:58 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
I do not know that. If true, that would narrow it down!
Rachel Rogers
6:59 pm on Sunday, January 22, 2012
Sorry to inform you Tom, Drew did see the movie....his attorney brought his computer and they watched it together. Drew laughed and digged at it throughout the movie. Read Snead's column in the Sun-Times.
Analyze This
11:01 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
I didn't even know the movie was being aired yet! I guess there was a reason for it to be underpublicized.
Good luck finding a jury pool. This movie might be Drew's road to acquittal!
Gary
11:18 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
It's on Lifetime a few times again today (Sunday), and probably in the future too.
Tom Selleck
11:02 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
Gary you sound like a logical person! At this point if there were a trial ,do you think Drew can be found guilty fairly beyond a reasonable doubt?
Gary
11:23 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
Hard to say. It seems like in this day and age you can get away with murder, but go to jail for jay-walking. I think that there might be enough evidence for a fair jury to convict. I don't know how much evidence the state has, but I think it should be more than what we know about to be able to keep Peterson in jail for so long.
Watchful Eye
11:35 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
Twelve people must agree on a verdict. It might not start out that way when it will come time to deliberate, but a blatant refusal by one or some jurors to reach a unanimous decision is not justice. If someone were to get on that jury to further their own agenda, that should be a concern to everyone, whichever way it goes. NO ONE can predict what a jury will do. Hopefully, and that is all anyone could ask, they take their time, they consider all of the information presented to them, and they reach a fair and just conclusion. If they will be able to explain away the inconsistencies in Peterson's alibi, his financial gain, his strange and odd behavior as a police officer in gaining access to his ex-wife's house when discovering her body, the documented abuse of her as verified by an ER report, testimony that Peterson tried to get a "hit man" to kill Kathleen, Kathleen's letters to seek help because of her fear of her ex-husband, his documented taunting of her, the improper placement of a police officer on the coroner's panel, the lack of proper investigation by the cops, as they admitted in testimony, the initial lack of bath towels, rugs and clothing for Kathleen's bath, etc., etc., then I suppose they will acquit him. If they want pictures and video of the actual crime, it's time for all of us to give it up.
samuel
11:04 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
IMO it was hindered by legal issues and the movie suffered because it is too premature to show any actual involvement in two murders. Let's face it, the only reason we know the man's face and voice is because it's likely he killed two of his wives. Instead, the movie had to depict what we were already sick of seeing: Drew's tasteless and cruel public antics. The private conversations between he and his wives were speculative since they could only have been guessed at. The writing was what I'd expect from a Lifetime movie (not very good) so it was weird to hear the occasional direct quote from Peterson amid the platitudes of "I''m going to check on that chicken". etc. For me the movie was flawed because it couldn't veer too far in either direction. We couldn't see Peterson hitting Kathleen Savio in the head and then struggling to hold her under the water, or throttling Stacy Peterson in their bedroom. But neither did we see the helpful neighbor that no one will deny Drew was because they wanted to make sure that we understood what a jerk he is. So we got this weird caricature with way too much attention paid to getting the hair and accent right. However, I am hopeful that the movie did some good in raising awareness about the kind of abuse that can be dealt by a sociopath narcissist. I don't think it will have an impact on Peterson's trial. He and his PR people have saturated the media too much with their own 'fairy tales' to have any grounds for complaining about the movie.
Vicki Murphy
11:20 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
The movie.......average at best.
Rachel Rogers
11:38 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
The movie told a story based on years of what was going on, in less than 2 hours. Drew Peterson is a scumbag, a manipulator and sociopath. What was really interesting was that previews for the movie "Courageous" on DVD was shown 3 times during the Peterson commercials - A must-see movie for every family out there. If more families took the lead in the raising of their children, girls wouldn't go out looking for father-figures to "hook" up with. Drew said in the movie he looked for girls who didn't have a relationship with their fathers and didn't have much to do with their families. Girls need to know what to look for in a husband, not just because someone sweet-talks them and buys them things. Once they are married to the sob, you can't get rid of them.
Tom Selleck
11:39 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
What still gets me is the 20 million dollar bond ! If anyone saw the news a few months ago, a women from Carol Stream along with her son drove to Elgin and she ran down a poor kid with her car crashing him to death and her son got out of the car and beat the poor kid as he is pinned by the car! And guess what? She gets out on bond for a very violent and unnecessary murder! Is that fair??
samuel
11:49 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
Hey, Selleck. I think Drew's account at the commissary is getting low. Quick, send him a couple bucks so he can buy some Twizzlers! ;)
Watchful Eye
12:02 pm on Sunday, January 22, 2012
Yeah, good idea! If he does get out, dare we ask if you have any 23 (or younger, maybe) year old daughters you could spare to satisfy his Big Daddy cravings? Seriously, if you're so worried about him, start sending him letters in support of him and let him know how concerned you are about his situation. Or start a donation campaign to raise money to free him.
The rest of us will continue to highlight what letting a domestic violence abuser get away with results in, and how awareness can stop it! You go right ahead and fret over Drew...
Larry Dunn
11:54 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
I feel rob lowes facial mannerisms were dead on but that horrible SNL DaCoach Chicago accent drives me NUTS
Joey Baggadonuts
11:57 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012
I hate it when actors try to do a Chicago accent, it usually is so far off the mark it's funny. Rob Lowe must have studied the movie Tommy Boy and Dan Akroid as Zalinsky.
bummed1
12:51 pm on Sunday, January 22, 2012
For all of you people who watched, shame on you. You are just watching something that is being played upon for years. The fact that you even watched, or thought of watching trash, makes you as bad as the people who produced this drek. Glamorizing a murderer (?) can be as fun as watching the Dahmer, Gacy, or Ted Bundy show. I had more entertainment not watching it. Just goes to show you that if you put garbage on the television, you will have people watching garbage!
Larry Dunn
12:56 pm on Sunday, January 22, 2012
Didn't watch to see a killer Bolingbrook resident watching Bolingbrook put on map. Alot of stories change the town bb squads. Looking for palm trees that is why I watched. I am not judge nor jury not up to me to say guilty or not. Plainfield did not get a movie Lisa Stebbeck vanished first
samuel
1:04 pm on Sunday, January 22, 2012
Oh preachy preach preach. It's an interesting case and people want to see anything related to it. If you are so much better than everyone else why are you even reading about the movie? Now, go scold your cat for watching birds.
bummed1
1:11 pm on Sunday, January 22, 2012
Interesting case? What is so interesting about a wife killer that you have to drop everything to watch? Oh its in Bollingbrook? Big deal! The trees were different? That's a reason to watch garbage? Yes I read comments, and read comments, but doesnt mean I have to watch a show, just because its there. Seems to me that most of you don't have anything better to do with your time.
krissy
1:05 pm on Sunday, January 22, 2012
What I would like to know is if they actually found her body.... I've seen many articles that states that they have reportedly found remains of a female with a lot of similarities to stacy and another missing woman and that was in 2010 and they said it would take two weeks to possibly identify but I still haven't found anything to confirm or deny if it is or isn't. I really wish they would find her remains so she can be put to rest and be brought back home with her family where she belongs they need closure . The movie ways creepy to me how they protrayed Drew if that's how he acted in real life he's sick and a complete psychopath he deserves to be where he is. Stacy I really hope you are found.
Julie Berkowicz
2:08 pm on Sunday, January 22, 2012
I refuse to watch this movie. Why would anyone waste their time watching this? It a crime that they are giving him additional publicity; he is arrogant enough that this is just boosting his ego. This film accomplishes no good in terms of bringing justice to the crimes of at least two women and their families. Why does our society encourage these stupid films and reality shows? If you care, get out and make a difference.
John Beskoon
2:24 pm on Sunday, January 22, 2012
I did not finish watching whole show yet. I do want to give Mr. Hosey credit on the hard work and His part on this story about our friend Drew. Guilty or not that's up to a jury IF they can find one that lives in a BOX. This guy is as well known as Mike Jordan. Whatever happen to Lisa?
Vivian Zigmont Benner
4:02 pm on Sunday, January 22, 2012
Didn't even bother watching it !
samuel
4:08 pm on Sunday, January 22, 2012
Everyone is free to watch what they like on TV with out some holier-than thou judgment from someone else. Either you saw the movie or you didn't. If you didn't watch the movie then you aren't entitled to an opinion about it.
Jan
4:26 pm on Sunday, January 22, 2012
I didn't see it, but find it questionable the movie was even made before the jury (hopefully they will) got the story.
Woodridge Resident
5:26 pm on Sunday, January 22, 2012
I thought the movie was pretty good! I only laughed hard when they showed Drew and his "crews" in a scene in the bar (which is supposed to be Tailgators) and there was a cloth covered table with candles. I have been there many times and its a good night if there is toilet paper in the bathroom. Other than that, it sure made him look like a complete idiot.
karen wilson
6:40 pm on Sunday, January 22, 2012
The movie was average at best.. but glad they got the word out on such a tragic story!
Uncle Jesus
7:20 pm on Sunday, January 22, 2012
I didn't see the movie until this morning, since I had to repair my outside cellar door, which is standard on every Bolingbrook house. I think the Peterson children are extraordinary, because they were able to predict that Derrick Rose would be a star for the Bulls back in 2004, when Rose was a Freshman in high school. I also liked neighbor "Karen" (Sharon) giving the Peterson children popsicles as a treat, even though it was mid-October. Again, one of Drew's kids shows amazing foresight by wearing a Marian Hossa Blackhawks jersey five years before Hossa came to Chicago. No wonder he graduated with Honors from "Bolingbrook Middle School". My favorite was watching the babe from Big Bang Theory and the babe from Mad Men playing wives 3 and 4. Me-wow!
Elaine Howe Zager
10:44 am on Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Steve I'm still trying to find the Play It Again Sports we have!!
Chauncey
7:37 pm on Sunday, January 22, 2012
Loved it! I was so tense that I unconsciously ate through two bags of popcorn!
Tom Selleck
8:01 pm on Sunday, January 22, 2012
Drews children all being cared for from Drews $77,000.00 pension!
Tom Selleck
9:40 pm on Sunday, January 22, 2012
Sorry peteee363 regardless of the out come ,Drew keeps his pension for life, either him collecting it when or if he's acquitted or his pension goes into a bank account for his children until he dies if he is convicted! He can't lose his pension unless he committed a felony while working on duty and was convicted!
Sue
10:14 pm on Sunday, January 22, 2012
Really a very sick situation and extremely sick man. Being a cop, he is quite smart about all the ins and outs of everything. He has outsmarted even his own cop friends. He brain washed his kids and even the public about Stacy being an insecure person. He is a swift talker and convinced many people to side with him. 'Untouchable" is surely a perfect title for the movie. If he weren't so close to his buddy cop friends, I believe that the police would have acted sooner on behalf of Stacy and all the complaints that she had been making about how Drew treated her. And nobody can find that blue container??? Drew is so sick that he could have taken Stacy's body and put it thru a wood chipper somewhere and nobody would even think to look there. I know that sounds sick but I saw a woodchipper alongside the road one day and immediately thought that Drew could have done just that. Gives me the creeps. And... who was watching his kids all the times that he was leaving his house? He forbid Stacy's mom from watching them. If the system doesn't give him the death penalty, God will surely take care of his pretty little butt. So sad that all these family members have to suffer because of one SICK person. Also, his third wife Cathelinewas given a reason for death as being...accidental??? Sure looks like Drew was very convincing to his local police friends that her death was simply accidental. Just goes to show how convincing this sick man can be.
Amber
12:19 am on Monday, January 23, 2012
How would he get the death penalty? Illinois no longer has the death penalty! Besides he will walk, yes I think he did it, but there isn't enough evidence to get him for Kathy's death and their is no body so their can't even prove Stacey was killed.
Tom Selleck
10:26 pm on Sunday, January 22, 2012
Bolingbrook had nothing to do what so ever in the investigation of Kathy's death! Period!!' State Police handled it all! As far as a death penalty that's a joke ! There's far worse murders out there and they are getting 20,30 years and getting out after serving half!
Joseph Hosey
8:04 pm on Friday, January 27, 2012
"There's far worse murders out there." So this is one of those not-so-bad murders?
Watchful Eye
12:30 am on Saturday, January 28, 2012
"There's far worse murders out there?" Did I read this right? There's far worse murders than Drew Peterson having killed Kathleen Savio? Does that mean he's not so bad, or does that mean Kathleen's life is not as important as some other poor murdered soul?
OMG, every time I think I've seen it all when it comes to this case, there's always something or someone to prove me wrong.
Incognito
12:50 am on Monday, January 23, 2012
It was interesting...Of course Staci can not tell us what happened and certainly Drew Peterson isn't going to do that either. I would like to know if the neighbor portrayed in the movie had any input in the dialog ...now that would be truly interesting to hear.
robin51
1:06 am on Monday, January 23, 2012
Maybe Tom Selleck can answer that question! He seems to know a lot of information about Drew Peterson.
simone
1:47 am on Monday, January 23, 2012
The funny thing is I never watched the movie but heard it was on I was on facebook and looked up drew peterson just to see if they cancelled his page and right under his is another person with the name drew peterson , and tom sellecks photo . As a default pic . Interesting . Are we sure that tom selleck on here isn't really drew peterson, and yes in jail u can have use of a computer .tv , so how do we know it really isn't drew peterson as tom selleck just a thought . Either way noone here will change what's happened and what the outcome of the trial will be .
simone
1:55 am on Monday, January 23, 2012
And that is sad, the children and the family members of each individual in this case has been affected and they will never be the same . The children are the ones who will suffer the most , who do they really have in their lives now?
robin51
1:57 am on Monday, January 23, 2012
Simone we DONT know that TOM SELLECK isn't DP. If you go back and read thru the comments he seems to know A LOT about him and what has been going on on his life. It could be him or his sleaze bag attorney. He was apparently there with DP watching the movie with his computer.
robin51
2:04 am on Monday, January 23, 2012
Wow Simone I just reread your comment about his FB page and Tom Sellecks picture right under DP name, now that's a no brainer. I also hope Staceys and Kathys kids are doing well and they never see the likes of him ever again.
simone
2:12 am on Monday, January 23, 2012
I do know that the family and also drew peterson were able to watch the movie yesterday the 21st when it came out and if they want to they should. After all it does depict their story, but I have read each and every comment on here and yes very informed on the story mr selleck . U should check out facebook and see the pic. I just found that interesting. I was actually at the will county court house getting some papers files for personal reasons when the jury selection was going on for drew petersons case . I also lived in plainfield off 111th @ the time . When the other lady lisa dissapeared . I do have friends that are police officers not for bolingbrook , mainly on the s side and city but I do know drew can keep his pension so hopefully the kids are getting that since it can't be taken away . If u had children and something happened to u wouldn't u want them to have as much as possible ? So they could be taken care of . They will never see their mothers again and prob not their father , and don't get to see certain family members . Its sad . And the other thing is has he paid for this attorney or is he court appointed? Because if he is court appointed the attorney cannot decide if he is or isn't going to reprsent him . So he may be just doing his job and not have to be a sleeze bag. ( The attorney that is )
simone
2:17 am on Monday, January 23, 2012
Yes, right under . Interesting how the comments from mr selleck have stopped . ?
Marsha
11:56 am on Saturday, January 28, 2012
That is awesome.......because in past cases, the "client" wouldnt TALK, but Old Tom Selleck sure does alot of talking. I hope the FBI is on to this blog. they can sure piece together alot of info just connect the computer its coming from. Im sure Mr. Selleck will morph into another name or vanish. Interesting take on the FB. What a worm.
robin51
2:33 am on Monday, January 23, 2012
Simone I just looked on FB and I seen what you were talking about, interesting how his comments stopped for sure. And of course I want his children taken care of. They don't deserve any of this, nor does the families.
robin51
2:37 am on Monday, January 23, 2012
His attorney I just don't care for. Not sure if its because he's defending him or what.
robin51
2:43 am on Monday, January 23, 2012
I'm not sure if his court appointed, to be honest I don't think he is. I think he's supposes to be high profile!!
simone
2:56 am on Monday, January 23, 2012
I do know he had a different attorney at the beginning and no longer representing him , but w the charges he needed an attorney no brainer on that one so I'm not sure if his attorney is court appointed but , a lot of people will dislike attorneys for representing people with such charged crimes . Its almost natural.
simone
3:02 am on Monday, January 23, 2012
The other thing is in the us its hard after media gets a hold of thigs , news facts and things get distorded , sometime evidence is lost .look at the anthony trial the outcome on that one. So even after all of what's happened in this case no one knows what will unravel or come out of all this , until it actually is time for the verdict . I think its hard picking out a jury in cases such as these
robin51
3:15 am on Monday, January 23, 2012
I do know the movie wasn't accurate. There is no possible way they could have known what went on in Staceys bedroom between the two of them. And with him putting Kathy in the jail cell, I can't believe that could ever happen. But they had to spice the movie up. Either wayhe was a creep. I watched him from the beginning, a lot of it was just as he portrayed himself.
robin51
3:19 am on Monday, January 23, 2012
As for picking a jury, I thinly it will be just like the Casey Anthony trial. But let's hope theses jurors take their time and look at all the evidence. And I'm sure they have more then they are letting on.
robin51
3:20 am on Monday, January 23, 2012
Dang auto correct. * I think
simone
5:49 am on Monday, January 23, 2012
Not sure about the movie I haven't seen it I fig honestly y watch it , first its going to be a little hollywood all movies usually are. Second they never found stacey so where's the outcome besides we know he's in jail. And she's still missing . Or worse most likely . Third, without the trial the people really don't know know more than what's been in the media and whatever evidence is "new " or different we won't know till the trial . Noone in hollywood knows that so I think pay the actors and the rest of the money should go to the city of bolingbrook to compensate the tax payers for what went on . Or atleast torwards the expenses of the search for stacey or her body .Well, hopefully this will turn out like its suppose to without a circus and a half like half of these judicial proceedings usually are because of the media and cases like the casey anthony case where evidence gets tainted lost or ? Its crazy in this day and age how often that happens . Sad really.
optomist
7:15 am on Monday, January 23, 2012
Beyond a resonable doubt comes to mind. I've known ladies that, "who would never leave their kids" leave with no regrets or turning back because of home situations. I've experienced the controlling older man syndrome. I've slipped in the tub causing bruising and a hit to the head(I was alone). One never knows unless you're there...
Tori
8:04 am on Monday, January 23, 2012
If someone in America has NOT heard of the Drew Peterson case by now, they must be living under a rock. Almost everything in the movie has already been made known to the public. It also has to be hard to write a 2-hour movie script that covers all of the happenings over the past 5 years. I got a kick out of Rob Lowe's portrayal of Drew and yes, agree, he overdid it with the Chicago accent at times (da Bears!).
Tom Selleck
8:57 am on Monday, January 23, 2012
Hello everyone big Daddy's back!!
Lori
9:34 am on Monday, January 23, 2012
Why hasn't Glasgow brought this to trial if he has a sure case...maybe because he's waiting for something solid instead of hearsay, or enough people try Drew in the media/public opinion. Our legal system is getting to be a joke, give him his day in court and end this case. I don't know if he's guilty or not..not basing my verdict on what others think of his attitude or looks,
guilty/ or non-guilty should be decided in court.
my opinion
11:28 am on Monday, January 23, 2012
All they have is hearsay. Even if convicted by the hearsay evidence, it will be thrown out by the SCOUS.
Then Drew will sue Will county and the village of BB for millions.
tom
8:58 pm on Monday, January 23, 2012
Drew's legal team have delayed the trial multiple times.
naomi donovan
9:41 am on Monday, January 23, 2012
BASED on a true story. NOT a TRUE story. No one said it was going to be all TRUE! I thought it was quite entertaining. Although they aren't the best, I am a fan of the Lifetime movies.
In this movie, I thought Rob Lowe did a great job. I also wish on the real life side, they would find Stacy :(
PKR
11:42 am on Monday, January 23, 2012
I found it entertaining. It reminds me of a soap opera. It takes a few facts and a whole boatload of rumors and attempts to make a movie about it. If anything it just tells people what they already know. Drew Peterson is extremely creepy and they don't have any strong evidence against him.
Greg Nelson
11:50 am on Monday, January 23, 2012
Hollywood making money is what I saw.
Manny
1:37 pm on Monday, January 23, 2012
Didn't watch it. No need to bring any more attention to this person than the press is doing already.
Tom Selleck
9:15 pm on Monday, January 23, 2012
Who fed Joe Hosey the biggest B.S. that there was a party in the Police lock up and also Drew placing Kathy in a cell! What a bunch of bunk!!
John Law
1:32 am on Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Haha. The Big Daddy line had me dying. Along with the "I'm untoachable blank" line. I've now used them multiple times in my personal life for comedy. So thanks Hosey for contributing to some great comedy. The was like an SNL parody right? Da Bears Da Bears Da Bears. I didn't know Coach Ditka was married to Stacy.
Ernie Carneau
2:17 am on Tuesday, January 24, 2012
I think Mr P just might pull this whole thing off, and all he'll really get is time served. It's my understanding that they have no good solid evidence. They just know he did it, as we all do. That cannot convict. The gloves won't fit again.......
Tom Selleck
10:12 am on Thursday, January 26, 2012
I agree Ernie!
Ernie Carneau
12:03 am on Saturday, January 28, 2012
Well, there's so much that we don't know. Alot of the movie "could" have happened. No one was paying attention because everyone thought he was on the up & up. Seriously, a cop killer who targets wives? It's a first that I know of, at least 2 of them. And come on, we all know he killed both of them, even if we can't prove it.
Tom Selleck
9:03 am on Saturday, January 28, 2012
We can only assume he may have killed one and the other is missing! Here in the good old U.S. we are innocent until proven guilty! That's what I can't stand here , people have Drew convicted already!
Joseph Hosey
9:08 am on Saturday, January 28, 2012
Actually, Tom, it sounds like you're the one who has him convicted of murder. Only, according to you, there have been "worse" murders perpetrated by others (what?). So, if we follow this train of thought, Drew should be let out of jail? Or get a lower bond? Or ... what is it you're trying to say again?
Tom Selleck
9:20 am on Saturday, January 28, 2012
Sorry I never mentioned he's guilty of anything!
Tom Selleck
9:31 am on Saturday, January 28, 2012
Also Joe his 20 million dollar bond is a joke! A career criminal from Carol Stream stabs his wife to death with several stab wounds and gets a $750,000.00 bond!
Watchful Eye
12:30 pm on Saturday, January 28, 2012
Selleck, I didn't realize my comment was over your head. Obviously, your reading comprehension is a little off-the-mark. Let me help you. If you re-read my statement, which you have now re-posted twice, I did not say Peterson was the worst murder defendant ever. I said he was the biggest "clown" of a murder defendant. I'm sorry, I didn't realize that my comment was too difficult for you to understand. Forgive me.
One other thing, Selleck. There is no need to re-post my comment,which you have done twice now. Do you have a problem with me posting here? You sure are being rude to me.
Tom Selleck
1:04 pm on Saturday, January 28, 2012
Oh sorry watchful eye ! I'll man up and admit I misread your comment! Over the years I've seen far worse biggest clowns of a murder defendant ever ! Shall I name several over the years? Watchful eyes since I don't want to hurt your sensitive feelings, I removed one of my comments !
Watchful Eye
2:08 pm on Saturday, January 28, 2012
You do whatever you want Selleck. I really don't care. My feelings are just fine, thank you.
Tom Selleck
4:10 pm on Saturday, January 28, 2012
My feelings are fine too ! I just love to stir the pot here and ruffle everyones feathers to see how stupid they react!
Tom Selleck
7:28 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2012
I found this to be very interesting ! This idiot from Bolingbrook stabs his mother to death for no apparent reason and flees to be found 85 miles away! His bond 5 million for one count of murder, bloody knife and violent crime scene! Drew Peterson one count of murder 20 million bond and 7 year old crime scene and hearsay!
http://philippinetimesofsouthernnevada.com/featured/pre-trial-up-tuesday-for-fil-am-in-moms-killing/
tom
7:43 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Maybe Drew and move to Naperville if he ever gets out of jail.
Tom Selleck
8:02 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Tom you write like you are illiterate ! Read your previous comment!
Joseph Hosey
8:05 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Easy there Selleck. You've had some pretty shoddily put together comments yourself. Stop the personal attacks.
Tom Selleck
8:56 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Sure Joe ! Just for you!
Joseph Hosey
9:00 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Thanks Magnum.
Robert
7:43 pm on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
If Drew Peterson looked like Rob Lowe these babes would have never dumped him like they were. Did "big daddy" mean Drew looked like he was pregnant?
Tom Selleck
6:53 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
I still wouldn't want to have messed with Drew!!!!!
Faceless Victim
5:35 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
Just like the numerous repeated news articles he posted in the Herald News, it seems that Joe Hosey was more interested in hearing his own name than telling a real story. It was quite self serving... Joe, next time start at the beginning of the story instead of the middle and maybe you'll have something. Drew was a dirty cop all the way back when he was a NARC for Will county. You seem to have missed a lot of information that would paint Drew in a less than gleaming light, although as you have referred to him as "Will County's favorite son" and several other light monickers, I believe you actually look up to Peterson. No mention of Kathleen being treated for the beating she took at the hands of Drew Peterson. It was a shoddy made for TV spoof at best. Sorry, I never thought you were all that great of a writer when you were with the Herald, which is a dead news source anyway. Do dome research about Drew and how he was buying drugs from Bindy Rock and later set up Rock when his buying was discovered by his superiors and he claimed he was acting as a rogue agent for MANS.....
Tom Selleck
6:56 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
Drew was never accused by MANS of buying drugs! As for Binndy Rock he is a low life dirt bag drug dealer/ cop killer!!!
Tom Selleck
7:00 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
Joe Hosey how are you?I just want to throw you a little bone ! Did you ever try to talk to and ask the ex- Chief prior to the last two Chiefs ,why he didn't handle Drew differently or took disciplinary action against him!